Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Spy Shot: Production interior of Chevy Volt (maybe)
Rumormill: Lexus LF-A... Stillborn?
Ford reveals 2010 Mustang badge
REPORT: Chrysler may sell Dodge Viper rather than kill it
Audi develops R8 GT3 racer
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Journey R/T
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Jeep Compass Sport 4x2
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Carrera S
First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Noah @ Feb 3rd 2006 4:55PM
File this one under "not going to happen".
I think navigation systems are stupid anyways, their a pointless gizmo that will crapup on you after 5 years and be so out of date in 10 people will laugh at your car because of it, just like they laugh at the 1990 Pontiac Bonneville SSE and it's silly DIC system. Putting a navigation system in a car doesn't make it more reliable it just makes it appeal to stupid people who can't use a regular map. VW should be figuring out how to make expensive german cars that DON'T fall appart, it seems sometime around 1993 they forgot...
My $10 paper map book works fine for me.