Filed under: Concept Cars, Coupes, Plants/Manufacturing, Dodge
Dodge Challenger a little closer to reality
DaimlerChrysler is a wee bit closer to putting some retro muscle into its lineup with the Dodge
Challenger. Automotive News hit up Chrysler Group's executive VP for global sales and marketing, Joe
Eberhardt, for a few answers regarding the pony car, and Eberhardt says that the company may have come up with a viable
business plan for production.
As expected, the plan involves building the car on the Magnum/300C/Charger platform, which would require a small expansion in production. Price point for the niche vehicle would come in above the mass-market Ford Mustang, and whereas the Mustang only sells V8s in about 30 percent of its vehicles, Dodge would offer V8s in all or almost all of its Challengers.
[Source: Automotive News via Autoweek]
_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Roy 8:23AM (4/25/2006)
So they have decided to compete against Charger rather than take on the Mustang? Brilliant!
Reply
Gary 8:51AM (4/25/2006)
Lol! And forget the Camero. Lets just chase our tail.
Reply
Gary 8:55AM (4/25/2006)
Lol!. And forget the Camaro. Lets just chase our tail.
Reply
tom 8:57AM (4/25/2006)
The pony cars of the 60's and 70's were built on larger sedan chasis. The Mustang was the Zephyr underneath for almost 15years. This is true to the genre, I believe, am I wrong here? I just think it's great that automakers are reviving these lovely cars, just in time for the boomers who saw them as children, are entering retirement and looking for an emotional buy. Now that's "Brilliant." Also, this is another segment that is brilliantly US. The minivan, the family station wagon, the pony car, the four door convertible, the SUV, are all US automaker inventions that expanded autos into the hearts and homes of millions here and worldwide. Nice to have an updated version for DCX, can't wait!
Reply
Michael G 9:03AM (4/25/2006)
So your saying Dodge is going to compete against its self? I thought the whole point was to steal away market share from the revised pony car segment.
Reply
njshift 9:14AM (4/25/2006)
The other posters see "Magnum/300C/Charger platform" and assume the car is going to be a 4 door. News Flash, auto manufacturers have been building coupes on their current production sedan chassis for ages. The Challenger will directly compete against the Mustang and upcoming Camaro.
Reply
jayray 9:14AM (4/25/2006)
I hate all the "baby boomer" marketing tactics. Wake up fellow boomers... we're being taken for a marketing ride.
Reply
Vinny 9:22AM (4/25/2006)
This and the current Mustang have been the only vehicles that have made me even look at pictures of domestic cars. If they stay true to the prototype, my considerations would be Honda, Toyota, Nissan and the Challenger. The Challenger only for fun. Not for the same reasons that I look at Honda, Toyota or Nissan.
Reply
Poe 9:46AM (4/25/2006)
I like it a lot... but if it's not competitive with the Mustang GT price-wise, it WILL fail.
Reply
Tankstelle 9:53AM (4/25/2006)
I'm so surprised by all the positive reactions to this car. It just screams white trash to me, but I live in the Northeast and am probably out of touch with the tastes of those in the South and Midwest. Hey if it'll sell, build it.
Reply
JJ 9:57AM (4/25/2006)
This car is not competing with the charger, from what i've heard they'll be using the same chassis but with a few modifications (like shortening the current chassis by a few inches) They've been saying they were going to do that all along.
and as this being a two door... id oubt the overlap of Challenger/Charger buyers will be huge. I mean people buy 4doors for different reasons than they buy 2 doors.
and as for the price range if all the cars are V8's then yes it'll be above the base price for the mustang. dont forget a vast majority of the mustangs sales are the V6 versions.
Reply
Dm 10:04AM (4/25/2006)
There are people (including me) lining up to buy one of these. What nobody can understand is why DCX is taking so long to announce they are officially going to build it. I mean they are making comments on what the pricing is going to be but yet we don't know (officially) if they will build it. Sheeesh.
Oh, and if you don't believe me that the market is there, take a look here.
http://www.challengertalk.com/forums/index.php
Reply
SGV 10:04AM (4/25/2006)
Too bad is so damn ugly.
Reply
Corey W. 10:05AM (4/25/2006)
I'd have to agree, something doesn't sound right. I love the Challenger, but what market are they looking at? And with news that SVT is not going away, they definitely need to be competitive with the Mustang.
Reply
Puff Chippy 10:05AM (4/25/2006)
This car will succeed, although on a more limited basis. Not everyone wants to drive their neighbors 6 banger Mustang and will be willing to pay a little more for something special. If I didn't have a need for 4 doors I'd buy one in a second over some snoresville Hontoyotasan.
Reply
Tim 10:16AM (4/25/2006)
Tom (#3) The early Mustangs (at least 65-70 for sure, and probably through 73) were built on the Ford Falcon platform.
Reply
Optimus Prime 10:22AM (4/25/2006)
ugghhhh
Not knowing what a Challenger is, this car does nothing for me. It just upsets my stomach ... it would be like riding around in some life-sized HotWheel.
Reply
JJ 10:27AM (4/25/2006)
How can you guys not like the styling of the challenger? it has all the same cues to the old styling as the current mustang does. Now if you're not into retro then i understand... but not reason to call the car ugly which is most certainly is not. If you consider this car ugly... the mustang and camaro concept (not to mention most cars) must do nothing for you.
Reply
Corey W 10:29AM (4/25/2006)
You know a V6 with good MPG would not be such a bad idea.
Reply
Santino 10:32AM (4/25/2006)
its just funny how the charger/300/magnum and the soon to be in production challenger are all based on a near 15 year old platform, which were the worst platforms ever made by mercedes. one mans garbage is another mans treasure i guess.
Reply