
Recently VW/Audi blessed the Autoblog Garage with the presence of a 2006 Audi A3 2.0T and a 2006 Volkswagen GTI. These two cars come from the same parent company and rest on the same A5 platform that also underpins at least 10 other cars sold worldwide under the VW Group umbrella. Our testers also share the same engine, a 2.0L turbocharged four-cylinder with direct injection that produces 200 horsepower and 207 ft-lbs. of torque. While the direct-inject 2.0T is currently the biggest motor available for a Golf variant sold in North America (until the R36 arrives), it represents the base engine for the A3, which can also be had with a 250-hp 3.2L V6. And isn't that how it should be between these two companies? That is, what's best for VW is just the beginning for Audi.
Since we had these brothers back-to-back in the Autoblog Garage, we thought their sibling rivalry would make for a compelling comparison. While the GTI starts at a mere $21,990 and the A3 at $24,740, both can be optioned up into the high $20K range faster than you can say Fahvergnugen and Vorsprung durch Technik. So the question we pose is this, for a similar amount of dough which one do you go for?

Let's set the stage before we pit this pair against each other in Autoblog octagon. The 2006 Audi A3 2.0T we received has the base 6-speed manual transmission. The only options it came with are the Sport Package ($1,800) and Bi-Xenon headlights ($650). The Sport Package adds leather appointments, a multi-function steering wheel and sport seats inside the A3, while dressing up the exterior with 17-inch double-spoke alloy wheels, a roof spoiler and front fog lights. The suspension is also tuned a bit stiffer to reduce roll.

This raised the price of our A3 up to $27,910 including a $720 destination charge. An Audi A3 3.2 S line Quattro with the larger V6, 6-speed DSG transmission and Quattro all-wheel drive tops out in the nosebleed section with a $41,385 price tag. Robert Farago over at The Truth About Cars, however, seems to suggest that steep cost of admission might be worth it for the S line. Clearly, however, the A3 2.0T is the base model, and our tester reflects what's available at the bottom of Ingolstadt's barrel.

Our VW GTI tester, meanwhile, was loaded with every item from Wolfsburg save the kitchen sink. Options included a DVD-based nav system ($1,800), the 6-speed Direct Shift Gearbox (DSG) transmission ($1,075) and the wallet-busting Package 2 ($3,160) that adds a power sunroof, Sirius (or XM) satellite radio, heated front seats and washer nozzles, and heavily bolstered leather sport seats. The last item on the list is a set of 18-inch "Lamborghini-esque" Hufeisen Alloy wheels around which a set of P225/45 H R17 summer performance tires are wrapped liked rubberbands. Just as clearly that our A3 was entry level for Audi, the GTI is the summit of VW's Golf bloodline for the moment.

One would think that because the A3 and GTI share a platform that their dimensions would be extremely similar, but in truth only their wheelbases at 101.4 inches for the A3 and 101.5 inches for the GTI come close to matching. The A3 is actually shorter in height, wider and longer than the GTI by inches in each measurement. Though the GTI's supposed to be the street racer here, its body shape is carried over from a utilitarian economy car and therefore appears a bit thin and tall when compared to the A3. The fact it rides .6 inches higher than its largely identical Euro-spec cousin doesn't help things either.

The GTI, however, is slick and smooth from every angle. VW has added a matte black chin spoiler, side sills and rear valance to make the lower fraction of the car appear invisible to the eye and thus reduce the visual height of the GTI, and the car's rear roof spoiler makes the hot hatch appear swept back as if it were splitting the air at 145 mph all the time. The GTI's visage is also made a bit more serious with a black honeycomb grille bisected by a black rather than chrome crossmember. The front fog lights are also imbedded in their own faux honeycomb inserts located in the lower corners of the front façade.

The A3 wears a similar gaping grille and pugnacious pout to the GTI's, but adds a bit of brightwork in the form of chrome trim. The A3's nose is also wider and shorter than the GTI's, which draws some attention away from the giant grille. The headlights that house halogen projection lamps also give the car a set of "angry eyes" and a seriously aggressive expression . While many have panned Audi for the design aesthetic responsible for its huge grilles (us included), the A3's stern mug won us over. The car's sport wagon proportions are tidy and the high beltline combined with a low roof make the A3 appear larger than it actually is.

Comparing the exteriors of this five-door sport wagon and three-door hatch makes it evident that VW/Audi is not practicing badge reengineering. Both skins incorporate their own brand identity and share few visual cues save for the big grilles up front. Their proportions also suit their purpose, with the GTI standing tall and wearing a roofline that doesn't compromise headroom or cargo volume in the back. The A3 has more room inside with which to work, so it hunkers down to the ground and lets its last pillars slope forward to meet the roofline.

It's hard to crown a winner in this battle of beauty as both cars received the support of fans while in our possession. Admirers approached us during each car's shoot to either ask what it is or say they had one on order.

We have to admit we're drawn to the GTI's smooth lines and lack of filigree. It's appearance even reminds us of what Audi's used to look like a couple generations ago: smooth, graceful, the epitome of tasteful restraint on the designer's part. On the other hand, we think the A3 is Audi's best attempt yet to make its garish grille look good. The key is the shape of the car's headlights that ditch Audi's doe-eyed look for one that's more stern and confident.

In a world where image is everything, we're going to give a slight edge to the Audi at the end of the day. When considering in which we want to be seen by our fellow man, there is no nip/tuck of a designer's pen that can change the fact that one of these cars is an Audi and the other a Volkswagen. All things being equal, we'd ask for the Audi's keys first everytime. Still, VW gets props for the handsome digs on its new hatchback, and the soon-to-be-resurrected Rabbit badge on the base models means an equally good looking Golf isn't far away.
Actually, thanks to Jonathan who snapped this pic in Bridgeport, CT we know the new Rabbits are travelling south on I-95.

Stay tuned for Parts 2 and 3 of our Sibling Rivalry review later this week...













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
kag @ Jun 19th 2006 1:10PM
No R36, only R32.
Jogia @ Jun 19th 2006 1:13PM
In the looks department the VDub wins hands down.
judd @ Jun 19th 2006 1:28PM
I have a cousin looking into the GTI for his wife. I asked him if he wanted to see the better version on it in my garage. She's now shopping for an Audi as well.
Michael Karesh @ Jun 19th 2006 1:45PM
I look forward to the upcoming 5-door GTI. Then the comparison will be even more apt.
Interesting that the VW has 17-inch tires on
18-inch wheels.
My site calculates a roughly $5,000 price difference in the VW's favor. Which is larger than I expected.
My site's pages for
the two:
http://www.truedelta.com/models/A3.php
http://www.truedelta.com/models/Golf.php
2007 VW prices soon.
avixe @ Jun 19th 2006 2:28PM
Should be pointed out that the GTI's base price of $21,990 includes more sport-oriented equipment (bi-xenons, the sport suspension) than the Audi's base $24,740 does. And, there'll be a 5-door GTI out around the end of the year.
I went with the GTI because I didn't think the Audi badge was worth $5k. You may find differently. (A quattro A3 2.0T would be a different story, though.)
Laura Lemay @ Jun 19th 2006 2:44PM
Excellent! I am shopping for both these cars. Actually I would really like the quattro DSG A3 but I am just agog at the price. Um. Whoa. No way.
Also re: comment #1: the new version of the R32 is indeed an R36. New engine.
Spy @ Jun 19th 2006 3:05PM
The A3 is a tight hatch/wagon - a true SportWagon. The suspension is firm and comfortable. The interior is topnotch.
fizzandpop @ Jun 19th 2006 3:11PM
Yes, VAG have created a massive dilemma for the sporty hatchback crowd. It's even worse in Europe where you also have to throw in the Seat (sportier, more chest wig) and Skoda (cheaper, less badge status). Say you finally settle on the VW, will you always be wondering every time you see an A3? Fiendish Germans. The press is no help either, they all seem to agree that you can't go wrong with either choice, there are pros and cons all round and no conclusions from anybody. However, this is an object lesson to GM about badge engineering. You build four distinct cars on one platform, each one designed to appeal to a different audience, then your only competition is yourself. Drive all four, and you've got four completely different experiences. It's not just about seat surfaces and corporate faces.
evlfred @ Jun 19th 2006 3:20PM
There is a good chance that the R32 will be the 3.6l here, VW will not be offering the 3.2 in any other vehicle, so it would be cheaper to use the 3.6l, which is already emmisions certified in other cars.
Dr. Woo @ Jun 19th 2006 3:55PM
Laura,
The Golf R36 is a rumor for the American market. Thus far the only Golf with a 6-cylinder is the R32 for Europe.
http://www.volkswagen.de/vwcms_publish/vwcms/master_public/virtualmaster/de3/modelle/golf/golf0/ausstattungslinien/golf_r32.html
risingsun @ Jun 19th 2006 4:09PM
Those GTI wheels are SO ugly. Looks like a Focal wheel that someone would pay dirt for at Les Schwab. But they're not as ugly as the colors of paint available for Lamborghinis now. One color is the same shade as the primer underneath a 95 dodge neon's peeling paint.
MikeInNC @ Jun 19th 2006 4:17PM
I'd wait for the all wheel drive Volvo C30 over these two. It will cost probably close to 30k fully optioned but, I really like the old P1800 rear window design and it's going to come in right around 266hp. I've currently got an S40 T5 and it's been a fantastic car thus far (22k miles).
http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/09/volvo-c30-concept/
If I had to choose though, as much as I think the Audi is nice, IMHO it looks a bit generic. I'd go with the GTI.
Michael Karesh @ Jun 19th 2006 4:18PM
fizz,
I wouldn't go so far as to call them four completely different experiences. If the A3 were not available many people would buy the GTI (especially once the 5-door arrives), and vice-versa. On my site, the GTI/GLI is the car most often compared to the A3, which is what happens when people PERCEIVE two cars as similar.
Not quite the same thing as being similar, I know, but it does tend to mean that people see them as alternatives.
steve lumley @ Jun 19th 2006 4:55PM
r32 is confirmed for US with 5,000 cars. My old lady needed a new car so a gti in united grey it is for (gulp) 29k. I was surprised how well the trans works in stop and go compared to the a3 3.2. I think maybe the 2 door is a little less awkward getting in and out. It is annoying on the 3.2 having that pillar, separating the front and rear window , so far forward.
james @ Jun 19th 2006 5:51PM
pleeeeease remember to tell us your mileage figures with these two cars.
-james
Brian Tiemann @ Jun 19th 2006 6:09PM
I hope "dough-eyed" (instead of "doe-eyed") was a typo.
Rick @ Jun 19th 2006 6:30PM
Does anyone know if the GTI doors are longer than the A3? My wife has an A3 and I have a MINI Cooper S, with the longer doors in the MINI it's actually easier for me to get into, I'm 6'4". If the door's are longer in the GTI I could get another A5 platform.
verdegrrl @ Jun 19th 2006 6:47PM
I think in some ways this is like the confusion that resulted in people comparing the Audi A4 (B5 - '96 to '02) with the Passat. Once you drove both cars back to back, even though they shared many platform items, you became aware of the many differences in feel, spec, and perception.
The A3 appears to have a much wider demographic, pulling in lots of middle aged folks, women, and mature(ing) sports sedan enthusiasts. It's likely to be one of several cars in the family fleet. The GTi appears to draw a younger and more male oriented demographic. It tends to be an only car.
Unless VW has been playing with the options sheet, the A3 gets Bluetooth, Open Sky double sunroof, and power seat(s) as options, while the GTi gets none of those. There are probably more differences as well.
Laura Lemay @ Jun 19th 2006 7:11PM
Re 9 & 14: The R32 was in the US already, in 2004. 5000 cars, 4WD, 3.2L V6, no DSG. They all sold but not spectacularly because the sticker was too high ($34K) -- or so I heard. Nonetheless used ones are hovering around $30-32K, even abused cars with fairly high mileage. They're already cult cars.
But you're right, there's no word on whether the new R36 will come to the US. (bummer)
Mike J @ Jun 19th 2006 8:23PM
The sticker on the original R32 was 29K, some dealers marked them up. They had no marketing and sold real fast. Used ones have sold for more than original sticker price. I just traded in my R32 and got 25k trade in. The next R32 will be a 3.2 VR6 with DSG, that is definite. VW has no reason to build an R36 since it would be only for the north american market. Why would they develope a new car, when they already have the R32 in europe. My only hope is that they bring a 4 door Polo GTI to the USA, are you listening VWOA??